UBS AG v Revenue and Customs Comrs [2016] UKSC 13

Facts

  • The cases of UBS AG and DB Group Services (UK) Ltd concerned employee bonus schemes designed to minimize tax liabilities.
  • The schemes involved the use of special purpose vehicles (SPVs) and the issuance of shares to employees, with provisions connected to options and contract terms.
  • HMRC contended that these arrangements were mechanisms to provide employees with taxable income disguised as capital gains, thereby attracting lower rates of tax.

Issues

  1. Whether the bonus schemes constituted genuine transactions or were artificially structured to achieve tax advantages.
  2. Whether the real economic purpose of the transactions should determine their tax treatment rather than their legal form.
  3. Whether tax law allows for arrangements lacking substantive business purpose beyond reducing tax liabilities to be recharacterized for taxation.

Decision

  • The Supreme Court found in favour of HMRC, applying an aim-focused approach to assess the substance over the form of the transactions.
  • The Court determined that, despite complex legal structures, the true purpose of the schemes was to provide employees with income, which ought to be taxed accordingly.
  • The Court dismissed the schemes as artificial, concluding there were no real business purposes beyond tax reduction.

Legal Principles

  • Tax liability must be determined by considering the genuine economic results of arrangements and not merely their legal or contractual form.
  • The “aim-focused” method requires examination of the actual purpose, economic effect, and overall outcome of the transaction.
  • Artificial arrangements designed solely for tax avoidance, without substantive commercial rationale, may be disregarded for tax purposes.
  • The judgment reaffirmed the principle established in cases such as Ramsay Ltd v IRC [1982] AC 300, emphasizing substance over form.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s judgment in UBS AG v Revenue and Customs Comrs; DB Group Services (UK) Ltd v Revenue and Customs Comrs [2016] UKSC 13 solidified the position that the real economic outcome and purpose of a transaction, rather than its legal structure or form, determines its tax consequences, thereby reinforcing the courts’ focus on combating artificial tax avoidance schemes.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal