Watts v Morrow [1991] 1 WLR 1421

Facts

  • Watts purchased a house after commissioning a survey from Morrow.
  • The survey prepared by Morrow negligently failed to identify significant structural defects.
  • After completion, Watts discovered the defects and had to live in a "building site" while repairs were carried out.
  • Watts sought damages for both the costs of repair and for mental distress resulting from the disruption and inconvenience.
  • The Court of Appeal was asked to determine the appropriate measure of damages, especially relating to the claim for mental distress.

Issues

  1. Whether damages for mental distress are recoverable in contract law for breach of contract.
  2. Under what circumstances non-pecuniary damages, such as mental distress, can be awarded for breach of contract.
  3. Whether the inconvenience and mental suffering experienced by Watts fell within any exceptions to the general rule excluding such damages.

Decision

  • Damages for mere disappointment or distress caused by a breach of contract are generally not recoverable.
  • Exceptions exist: damages are recoverable when the contract's purpose is to provide pleasure, relaxation, or peace of mind; or when mental distress is a direct result of physical inconvenience or discomfort caused by the breach.
  • Watts could not recover the full cost of repairs, but was awarded damages reflecting the excess purchase price paid due to reliance on the negligent survey.
  • The court limited damages for mental distress to the extent that it was directly linked to the physical discomfort caused by the defects and subsequent disruption.
  • The claim was not within the exception for contracts whose purpose is pleasure, but did fall within the exception for distress caused by physical inconvenience.

Legal Principles

  • The expectation interest in contract law aims to put the injured party in the position they would have occupied had the contract been properly performed.
  • General disappointment and mental distress from breaches of contract are not usually compensable.
  • Damages for mental distress may be awarded when a contract is specifically intended to provide pleasure, relaxation, or peace of mind, and the breach defeats this purpose.
  • Damages may also be awarded for mental distress that is directly attributable to physical inconvenience or discomfort resulting from the breach.
  • The distinction between general mental distress (not recoverable) and distress arising from physical inconvenience (potentially recoverable) helps control the scope of liability.

Conclusion

Watts v Morrow [1991] 1 WLR 1421 confirms the general exclusion of damages for mental distress in contract law, establishing clear exceptions for cases involving physical inconvenience or contracts for pleasure or peace of mind. The decision ensures damages are available only where mental distress is closely linked to tangible impacts, providing a structured approach to non-pecuniary loss in contractual claims.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal