Williams v Hensman (1861) 1 J&H 546

Facts

  • The case discussed issues concerning the termination of joint ownership in property.
  • It provides context for interpreting Section 30 of the Law of Property Act 1925 (LPA 1925 s30), which governs the legal sale rights for land owned by multiple individuals.
  • LPA 1925 s30 authorizes trustees of land under a sale trust to sell land without the need for unanimous beneficiary approval, provided certain legal conditions are met.
  • Joint ownership means all co-owners have equal rights to the property as a whole, while divided (or severed) ownership allows for specific shares that can be individually inherited or transferred.
  • The case outlined three methods for ending joint ownership: by individual action of a joint tenant, by mutual agreement of all co-owners, or by conduct indicating intention to sever.
  • These methods are relevant when trustees must determine how to distribute sale proceeds, especially if joint ownership has already been severed.

Issues

  1. Whether the case establishes the methods for severing joint ownership relevant to the application of LPA 1925 s30.
  2. How the severance of joint ownership affects the distribution of sale proceeds under a statutory sale.
  3. What legal responsibilities trustees have to beneficiaries when exercising statutory sale rights.

Decision

  • The court recognized three distinct ways to sever joint ownership: unilateral act by one joint tenant, mutual agreement among co-owners, and conduct evidencing an intention to sever.
  • Where joint ownership is severed before a sale under LPA 1925 s30, proceeds must be distributed according to individual shares rather than as joint tenants.
  • Trustees exercising the power of sale must comply with trust terms and act for the benefit of all beneficiaries, including seeking expert valuations and analyzing market conditions.
  • The requirement for overreaching ensures that sale proceeds are held for beneficiaries, safeguarding their rights even after the property's sale.

Legal Principles

  • Severance of joint ownership can occur by individual action, mutual consent, or conduct, as established by the court.
  • LPA 1925 s30 grants trustees the authority to sell trust land, usually without full beneficiary approval, subject to any restrictions in the trust.
  • Trustees must protect beneficiary interests by diligently managing the sale and proceeds, including adhering to "overreaching" requirements.
  • Beneficiaries can obtain court intervention, such as injunctions, to prevent improper use of the statutory sale powers.
  • Related case law (e.g., Re Mayo [1943] Ch 302) clarifies trustee duties in this context.

Conclusion

Williams v Hensman clarified the mechanisms for severance of joint ownership, which directly affect the operation of statutory sale rights under LPA 1925 s30 and the resulting division of proceeds among property co-owners, while emphasizing the protective duties of trustees toward beneficiaries.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal